Here's food for thought, though:
"It seems like it's a cheaper alternative to trucking in bottled water, which has a shelf life," said Rowe, who described himself as a fiscal hawk.(from the Wired.com article)
Once deployed, the machines could reduce the cost of logistical support for supplying water to the troops in Iraq by billions of dollars, said Stuart Roy, spokesman of the DCI Group, Aqua Sciences' public affairs firm.
The cost to transport water by C-17 cargo planes, then truck it to the troops, runs $30 a gallon. The cost, including the machines from Aqua Sciences, will be reduced to 30 cents a gallon, Roy said.
Mel's comment: so what would happen if, instead of trucking in water or machines, we just dug wells that could be used later? While definitely not practical everywhere, what a difference it could make in terms of the legacy that is left once we finally are gone from Iraq.
2 comments:
Dang it, I was all excited about technology and then Mel has to go and be deep about the whole thing.
heh heh heh... that's one of the many things a wife is good for...
Plenty of room to still be stoked on the tech though -- the ability to bring in one of those puppies and have water *immediately* could have a tremendous impact particularly on areas ravaged by natural disasters / wars / droughts / etc.
Post a Comment